Low-Skilled Workers Fell Victim to Minimum Wage Hikes During Great Recession, Study Finds
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
On January 1, fourteen states raised their minimum wages. From a five cent
increase in South Dakota to one dollar increases in Alaska, California,
Massachusetts, and Nebraska, these increases are intended to help workers at the
bottom of the economic ladder.
But intentions donft automatically produce positive results. A new paper
finds that raising
the minimum wage can hurt some low-skilled workers.
Just as economic theory since Adam Smith predicts, increasing the price of
labor reduces demand for it. Jeffery Clemens, a University of California, San
Diego economist, found that between 2006-2012—as the average minimum wage went
up--the employment of young, low-skilled workers went down. From the paperfs summary [emphasis mine]:
From 2006 to 2012, the average effective minimum wage rose by $1.72 across
the United States. The differential change between fully and partially bound
states was $0.62. Extrapolating from in-sample estimates to the full effect of
the $1.72 increase comes with standard caveats, which are discussed in section
4. My baseline estimate is that this periodfs minimum wage
increases reduced employment among individuals ages 16 to 30 with less than a
high school degree by 5.6 percentage points. This amounts to 43
percent of the decline in this groupfs employment between 2006 and 2012.
Further, it accounts for a 0.49 percentage point decline in the employment to
population ratio across all individuals ages 16 to 64.
The post-recession economy hasnft been able to reverse the trend generated by
the minimum wage increases, as AEIfs Micahel
Strain quotes from the body of the paper:
Between 2006 and 2010, this skill groupfs employment rate declined by 13
percentage points, from 40 percent to 27 percent. It remained down by 13
percentage points through 2014.
c
For present purposes, these developmentsf most relevant implication is that
the minimum wage has become more binding on the distribution of low-education,
low experience individualsf wages over time. The federal minimum wagefs rise
from $5.15 to $7.25 occurred over the same time period as a 20 percent
downward shift in the profile of this groupfs real wage distribution.
Imagine if advocates had their way and mandated a $15 per hour
minimum wage. How many low-skilled workers would have their job
opportunities go up in smoke? People like Wisconsin franchise owner Marshall Chay, who started
working at minimum wage through high school and college, would have a harder
time rising up the economic ladder.
Whatfs needed for sustained increases in wages is faster economic growth, not
wage policies that close the door on economic opportunity for the
least-skilled.